Profiles in Courage - Andy Schlafly

Andy Schlafly, son of the great Phyllis Schlafly, has long stood for promoting conservative values. He's combated the evil Wikipedia and their liberal biases to create Conservapedia, an intellectual project designed to expose the truth that evolution is a lie, McCarthy was a hero, and that the Bible explains everything. Lets take a look at this hero right now.



Lately, good ole Andy has taken on another throbbing example of liberal bias being forced down our quivering throats....the "theory" of relativity. After all, its just a "theory", and that don't mean much. As the great Conservapedia explains...

When Scientists Attack

Some of you may remember a recent post of mine attacking supposed polling of alleged scientists and their reported opinions on social topics. Therein, the radical liberal views of scientists, like believing in the global warming hoax, was promoted. At first, I doubted that these numbers were true, given the dominance of Rush Limbaugh listeners in the vicinity of my cubicle at the IT department. However, with the appointment of John Holdren to dark-lord science Czar, I fear that the evil forces promoting the evolutionism lie are winning out.



Seems this guy, Holdren, supported radical measures in a book he cowrote called Ecoscience. That right there tells me he's a radical eco-nut who loves trees more than people. And that's proven by several lines included in this 1000 page book he cowrote with 2 other people. And the smart folks at the totally not radical Washington Times have exposed his radical agenda.

John P. Holdren, named as Mr. Obama's science "czar" earlier this year, described this in a book he wrote with Paul Ehrlich -- author of the "Population Bomb," which predicted masses would starve due to exploitation of resources through the 1980s -- about the world's rapidly increasing population. In the 1977 tome "Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment," Mr. Holdren and Mr. Ehrlich, in addition to Mr. Ehrlich's wife, Anne, considered various ways to keep growth in check.

Several selections from the book have been highlighted at blogs critical of Mr. Holdren, particularly passages that appear to advocate sterilization, forced abortions and consideration of an "armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force" for population enforcement capabilities.

And this is the man that Barak Hussain Obama wants to install as a Czar over science. A czar is like a Russian dictator, which means Barak is a commie, and appointing czars is something that no president ever did before now.

This radical agenda, promoted only 32 short years ago in a book 1000 pages long coauthored by 2 other people in a section in one chapter about options for population control, clearly shows that Holdren was all for forced abortions. Where are our heroes like Tom Delay who would surely show Holdren the righteous path? There's no other explanation and these comments by Holdren (or his coauthors) in a few paragraphs in which these measures are not recommended but just described, should be ridden out on a rail, along with the Kenyan (or Zanzibarian) Barak Hussain Obama!!!

-------------

Edited to include menacing picture of Holdren pointing at us, telling us just how smart he thinks he is!!!

Figures Lie and Liars Figure

Ran across this poll and I have to say I have never seen a more blatantly dishonest poll since this one.

Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media
Scientific Achievements Less Prominent Than a Decade Ago

The headline is very misleading. When I saw it at the bottom of Drudge, I was thinking "good, people are finally waking up and not paying attention to science". Science is, after all, what has given us the evil religions of evolutionism and global warming alarmism. Still, I know several real smart people, some even trained in classical sciences like finance and hotel/restaurant management, and I can vouch that they are nearly all good, conservative, and Christian. But what this poll showed was just so out there it must be totally a lie. First, here's a scientists view on government (i.e. socialism) versus business (i.e. free market):



What a load of hoo-ey. Business is always more efficient and government is always more wasteful. That is just the facts. I thought scientists operated on the scientific method. So, from employing the scientific method myself, I have totally destroyed these polling numbers and exposed them for the lies that they are.

Next, numbers on the views of scientists.



Just more hoo-ey if you ask me. Smart scientists like Ken Ham know better. This is why we need to eliminate public schools for indoctrinating us into the lie that is the evolutionism lie. Maybe we can get our own advocate in our public schools like Texas might have. If only we could take these scientists to the Creation Museum and meet real smart folks like Ken Ham, I think we'd see these numbers drop sufficiently. But these numbers are lies anyway.

The end is the kicker and I think more proof that this "poll" was concocted by the liberal elist media.



Double hoo-ey!!!1!! 52% of scientists are liberal!?!? 35% are moderate?!?! Only 9% are conservative?!?!?! Just made up numbers, all of them. True science types, like Ken Ham and Bjorn Lomborg and Richard Linzen, are proof in the pudding that these numbers are inflated. What about Inhofe's 400 scientists that disprove global warming? Bet they didn't poll them....